Workshops / Hands-on

The PAEE/ALE organising committee greatly values the active involvement of participants in workshops / hands-on sessions, in line with the active involvement in projects as stimulated in our students. Different workshops / hands-on sessions are scheduled, meant to enable the enhancement of project practice and the reflection on practice.

 

Hands-on sessions

An important feature of the ALE workshop is the hands-on programme. Active learning approaches are usually aimed at the increase of student involvement in learning, therefore, a hands-on session on active learning count on active involvement of its participants. Three different hands-on are scheduled, meant to enable the enhancement of active learning practice.

Hands-on HO.A - What is the role of growth when talking about technology and sustainability?

Miguel Romá and Tomás Martínez - Signals, Systems and Telecommunications group (SST), University of Alicante, Spain

In the context of engineering education, it is compulsory to make the students think about the impact that technology has in many aspects of life. We, as engineers, and our students as future engineers, must be aware of both kind and awkward effects of technology from the widest possible range of points of view. Issues like how to manage technological waste (related to programmed obsolescence), the risk of the generation of unemployment caused by the use of technology (automation and robotics), the relevance of having a strong technological industry to support our working environment, the relationship between sustainability and renewable resources…, are clear examples of aspects suitable to generate interesting debates. However, there is a key element that is commonly left apart as it derives to uncomfortable conclusions. Can we talk about sustainability avoiding thinking about the effects of economic growth? In this hands-on we will present an activity used to promote critical thinking in students about the relationship between economic growth and sustainability. We will try to present the most common thoughts when technology, energy, sustainability and growth are placed in the same bowl. If we conclude that economic growth and sustainability are not odd with each other, a pleasant landscape will be shown in front of our eyes. Notwithstanding, if we conclude that sustainability is not achievable in a growth environment, the panorama will possibly be comfortless.

Hands-on HO.B - Sustainability in Engineering Education

Pau Bofill1, Montse Farreras - Department of Computer Architecture, UPC Barcelona Tech, Barcelona, Catalonia

This document presents a Hands-On session on Sustainability in Engineering Education. Sustainability is defined as the use of resources in such a way as to allow them to regenerate in time. Sustainability should be considered in connection with equity, so that the resource is equally available to everyone. Then several categories for analysis are defined, such as GDP growth, progress, environment or holistic so as to guide the discussion. The hands-on takes place in small groups, that are asked to write a short poster on how they would introduce the subject of sustainability in a project with their students. The learning goal is that sustainability is a holistic quality, that has to do with many dimensions at the same time.

Hands-on HO.C - Integration of the Model Based Design – Industrial Approach - for Teaching Engineering Science

Ascension Vizinho-Coutry - The Mathworks, Inc.

Model-Based Design (MBD) has been adopted in the past two decades by engineers and researchers.  By adopting MBD the development process is centered on the system model, from requirements capture, design to implementation and test throughout the process. Using Modeling, Simulation, Automatic Code generation and Test capabilities, MBD can be applied to any project ranging from small device implementation to enterprise applications and vehicles. The French Ministry of Education is revamping the science and technology flow, starting from High-School to University levels with the integration of “Engineering” into schools.  This is being done for two reasons: 1- to attract students to become engineers and 2- to reduce the gap between Educational schools and Industry by developing appropriate skills for the next generation of engineers. Engineering Sciences topics are attracting more attention and weight during evaluations and exams. French teachers are increasingly adopting MBD workflows within their courses. This workshop will present the association of the Model Based Design (MBD) and the recent French teaching Gap Analysis approach. This combination enables students not only to learn the Engineering workflow (or V-cycle) but also learn the disciplines relevant to the selected course. The main topics are: (i) Model-Based Design principles; (ii) Gap Analysis approach for teaching Sciences and Engineering; (iii) Teaching concepts through a simple problem: the design of logic of the angular position controller of a DC motor; (iv)Focus on different domains: mathematical equations describing the systems behavior and concepts relevant to engineering.


Invited Hands-on
 session

Using Flanagan’s critical incident technique to improve active teaching and learning in Engineering Education 

Michael Christie (Stockholm University)

Description: In this interactive plenary session the delegates will be introduced to John Flanagan’s critical incident technique (CIT). CIT has had a major impact on both quantitative and qualitative research since Flanagan first described it in the Psychological Bulletin in 1954, but in this session we will be using it more as a professional development tool. The presenter will explain briefly different ways of using the tool, both at an individual and team level. Our aim is to give you the opportunity to reflect on a specific instance when you felt you really activated your students’ learning. You will be asked to jot down what happened and why your incident exemplified active learning. As you soon as you have your story prepared you will join a group of three or four other delegates and then take turns to explain your incident and why it is a good example of activating learning. Each group should appoint someone to report back and after all the incidents have been described the group decides on what it considers to be the four most important ingredients of active learning that emerged from the incidents. The facilitator will ask each group to nominate three of their most important ingredients and begin to build a list of active learning characteristics. The reporter should try to sum up each ingredient in a few words, for example ‘good design’, ‘relevant, open questions, motivating material, intriguing problem etc. Once the list has been compiled there will be an opportunity to debate what key ingredients, types of context, motivation and attitudes are required to put theories of active learning into practice. The presenter will summarize the findings and explain how individuals can use this technique to systematically improve individual teaching and learning or carry out action research projects in teaching teams

Workshops

An important feature of the PAEE Symposium is the workshop programme. Projects approaches to learning are usually aimed at the increase of student involvement in learning, therefore, a symposium on project approaches like PAEE/ALE’2016 count on active involvement of its participants. Two different workshops are scheduled, meant to enable the enhancement of project practice and the reflection on practice.

Workshop WK.A - RoboSlam: Robot-Building Workshops for Engineering Educators

Shannon Chance, Damon Berry - College of Engineering and the Built Environment, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland

Paul Stacey – Department of Engineering, Institute of Technology Blanchardstown

 A volunteer team of engineering and robotics teachers from Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT) will offer a two-hour hands-on RoboSlam: Robot Building Workshop for educators who attend the PAEE and ALE conferences. Participants in this workshop will each construct a working robot and will also learn about our train-the-trainer program. No prior robotics experience is necessary!

Our team has used this Problem Based Learning format to teach hundreds of students and teachers in Ireland how to build and program robots. To date, RoboSlam has been delivered 38 times, to more than 677 participants and to an additional 100 students at our sister Institute of Technology in Blanchardstown (ITB), Ireland. We have trained many people to facilitate these workshops successfully, including third-level students studying electrical and electronics engineering and also tutors running a professional practice module at ITB.

 

Workshop WK.B - Active Learning Exercise: Viewing Other Students' Projects through Green Lenses

Jacqueline Asscher - Quality and Reliability Engineering, Kinneret College on the Sea of Galilee, Israel

 The activity as run with 3rd year undergraduate students. This 2.5-hour activity has several learning objectives:  get to know a number of good projects carried out by students from previous classes; learn about writing an abstract and writing and editing a project by experiencing reading 10 abstracts and one project; practice viewing projects from a sustainability point of view ("green lenses"); practice summarizing and presenting. The lecturer selected ten projects based on criteria of relevance to sustainability, good quality and variety of topics. Step 1: Working in pairs, students read all ten abstracts and selected and ranked five. This was done in advance by email. Step 2: Students worked in class in pairs, reading the project they were allocated and preparing a five minute presentation that answered two questions: What was the content of the project? How was sustainability considered, and how could it have been considered further? For example, in one project the reliability of a system was evaluated, but the cost of over-design (using materials and processes that are more expensive than required) was not considered. Step 3: Students gave presentations, each student answering one of the two questions. Step 4: Each student wrote a reflection exercise consisting of writing five points on "how to write a good abstract" and five points on "how to write and edit a good project". The students found the activity very useful as they will soon start their own final projects. They had ideas about how sustainability could have been incorporated in the projects that they reviewed. For the conference. Participants will enjoy seeing projects from other programs ("benchmarking") and experiencing one way that they can be used as a teaching resource. Also, this is an opportunity to look at a range of engineering projects from a sustainability point of view.